BIOL1102 FUNCTIONAL BIOLOGY 2000-2001
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY PRACTICAL SCHEDULES
This part of the course comprises three practical periods. The experiments will be carried out in rotation by groups as specified in the table below. Each student is allocated to the AM (morning session) or PM (afternoon session) and for all the practicals you will work in groups which will be assigned. A seating chart will be posted in the laboratory.
You are required to write practical reports for all the experiments. Each report should be handed in to your demonstrator one week after the results for that experiment have been completed. Practical reports will contribute to the final assessment of this course. A ‘zero’ mark will be assigned to those who failed to hand in their practical reports.
Practicals: 1. Photosynthesis & Hill Reaction
Timetable
|
|
|||
| Group | 2 Nov | 9 Nov | 16 Nov |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practical 1
A. Demonstration of the Hill reaction
4H2O light 4 [H] + 4 [OH chloroplasts
Hydrogen acceptor + 4 [H] ----------- > Reduced hydrogen acceptor
4 [OH] ------------------- > 2 H2O + O2
In the green plant the usual acceptor is the coenzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP). In this experiment you will add an artificial electron acceptor to the suspension of chloroplasts: 2,6-dichlorophenolindolphenol (DPIP). The reaction will be followed by observing the loss of the blue colour of DPIP as it is reduced.
DPIP oxidized + 2 [H] light DP1P.H2
Chloroplast Isolation
The isolation procedure should be carried out at 0 to 4°C. In practice use pre-chilled solutions and containers. Grind to a pulp about 5 g of Chinese spinach leaves (midribs and petioles removed) in a mortar, using initially 10 ml of phosphate buffer extraction medium (0.05 M phosphate buffer pH 6.9 with 0.4 M sucrose and 0.01 M KCl). Add more buffer till 40 ml have been added. Filter the pulp through a layer of muslin and centrifuge the extract at 1000 g for 10 minutes. Pour off the supernatant and resuspend the chloroplast pellet in 10 ml of extraction medium. Keep the chloroplast suspension chilled on ice.
Experiment Procedure
To each of 3 clean dry test tubes add 5 ml of phosphate buffer, and 1 ml of DPIP. Label the tubes. Take 1 ml portion of the chloroplast preparation and boil in a water bath for 1 minute. Switch on the spectrophotometer at least 5 minutes before taking readings. At zero time add 0.1ml of chloroplast suspension to tubes 1 and 2, and to tube 3 add 0.1 ml of the boiled chloroplast suspension. Mix the contents in each tube and measure the absorbance of each tube at 600 nm against a phosphate buffer blank. Place tubes 1 and 3, 30 cm away from a light bulb and take readings on both of these tubes every minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes for a further 25 minutes. Read tube 2 (kept dark by aluminium foil) at the same time intervals. Plot absorbance reading against time. What can you deduce from these results?
Observe some isolated chloroplasts under the microscope.
Spot strips of chromatography paper with the concentrated extract at a position 2 cm from the bottom of the paper strip using a fine capillary tube. Keep the spot to within 0.5 cm in diameter and concentrated (about 20 drops are usually necessary). Blowing on the spot between applications will increase evaporation of the solvent and help to keep the spot small. Suspend the paper strip in a boiling tube containing 1 to 2 ml of the solvent (petroleum ether: acetone mixture, 9 : 1) and stopper. Do not allow the pigment spot to dip into the solvent. Observe over a 10 to 20 minute period.
How many pigments can you separate? What are their Rf values?
A. The Münch pressure flow model
Select another piece of dialysis tubing and tie off one end as before. In the same manner as before stopper the open end of the dialysis tubing. Fill the tubing to the top with sucrose and I2KI solution. Insert the free end of the U-shaped tube through the stopper and into the sucrose- I2KI solution. Make sure there are no leaks in either of the sacs at each end of the U-shaped tube.
Support the entire system with a ring stand and clamp so that each sac is immersed completely in a separate beaker of water. Observe the flow of sucrose I2KI solution through the tube. You can try to find out how different concentrations of sucrose- I2KI solutions affect the flow rate.
1) What is the influence of turgor pressure on the flow of I2KI reagent and sucrose from one sac to the other?
2) How is the system studied in this experiment analogous to the translocation system of a living plant?
3) Why is the model studied in this experiment useful as a means of explaining the translocation of osmotically active organic substances within plants?
4) What are some of the objections to the mechanism of organic solute translocation as being totally analogous to the Münch pressure flow model?
B. Determination of water potential by the falling drop method
You are given a series of test tubes and specimen tubes containing sucrose solution of the following molarities: 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.45, 0.50, 0.55; the test series containing 3 ml of solution (in test tubes). the control series about 10 ml of solution (in specimen tubes). Cut some 0.5 ml of the plant tissue provided into small slices and place equal amounts in each of the test series sucrose solutions. Label and stopper the tubes and leave to stand for about an hour, shaking gently from time to time. Then add one drop of methylene blue solution (0.2% w/v in water) to each test tube in the test series and shake. To see if there has been any change in the density of the test series take a small quantity of the bathing solution in a micropipette and release it carefully within the respective control solution series. Watch the subsequent movement of the drop; if it rises the coloured solution has become less dense, i.e. the tissue has lost water to the solution. If the drop falls, the reverse has occurred. The water potential of the tissue will lie between the osmotic potentials of the solutions in which the drop changes direction.
The relation between the concentrations of the sucrose solution and their respective osmotic potentials are given here as:
[Sucrose] 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60
O. P. MPa -0.26 -0.40 -0.53 -0.67 -0.81 -0.96 -1.11 -1.27 -1.43 -1.60 -1.70
Practical 3
A. Determination of water potential by the weighing/measuring method
Using a cork borer, punch out 30 cylinders of about 4.0 cm in length from the potatoes provided. Immediately after obtaining a cylinder, trim both ends with vertical cuts to eliminate the suberized peripheral layers. Blot lightly with a paper towel; temporarily store the cylinders in a closed moist chamber lined with moist paper towels.
After all cylinders have been cut, weight them in groups of three to the nearest 0.001 g. Also measure the length of each cylinder accurately and record the mean length for each group. Immediately after measurement, put each group of cylinders in beakers containing 100 ml of sucrose solutions covering the range 0.15 M to 0.6 M in 0.05 M increments (i.e., you have 10 different concentrations). Cover each beaker with a petri dish; set aside for 2 hours at room temp.
After the prescribed time, remove the cylinders, one group at a time, from the solutions. Quickly blot the cylinders with a paper towel and measure the final fresh weight and length of cylinders for each group.
Plot a graph of loss or gain in weight/length against sucrose concentration and determine the molarity of the sucrose solution in which the tissue shows no change in weight/length. Read off the osmotic potential of this sucrose solution from the table given in the schedule for Practical 2b.
Using a similar procedure and illumination, determine the transpiration rates of the leaf when exposed to room-temp. and warm air currents. Use the blower provided, at a distance which will give the plants wind but not blow them over.
After the experiment, find the area of the leaf by tracing its outline on a piece of mm2 graph paper. Work out the transpiration rates under the various conditions in terms of weight of water transpired per cm2. of leaf surface (one side) per minute.