|
| |
Notes on Poverty and Social Security
Definition of Poverty
Conception and Measurement of poverty: e.g. poverty line,
calorie intake, social assistance level,
- Absolute poverty
–
- Someone is absolutely poor (赤貧) if s/he is below
subsistence level, i.e. sufficient to meet needs of food, shelter, clothing and commuting.
2. Relative poverty
- In different societies, there are different conceptions of being poor. A poor person in
an affluent society may be considered as rich in a poor country. A person earning 50% of
the median income in Hong Kong (about $5,000) is quite well off in Bangladesh where the
average wage is less than HK$400 per month.
- There are different methods of defining or designating the "poor" stratum in
society:
a) "Income level" approach :
- It usually refers to a designated income level;
- Method: choose a certain proportion of all wage earners (e.g. the lowest 10%, the lowest
quintile, etc.), the upper limit of such income group constitutes the "poverty
line". Or, choose a certain percentage of the median income, e.g. 45% or 50% of the
median income in the population.
b) "Pattern of consumption" approach :
- The poor have to spend most of their income for food, thus they have no extra money to
buy other non-food items. Beyond the subsistence level, the poor will begin to spend a
lower percentage of income in food. Thus, the level of poverty can defined as the level of
income at which increased income will lead to decrease in percentage of income spent on
food. Similar approach is to study the items that poor people cannot afford to spend and
then identify the income level below which the people will behave in such a manner as the
poverty line.
c) "Living standard" approach :
- It refers to the ownership of material items as indicator of being appropriate to or
below a certain general pattern of living in the society (e.g. ownership of automobile in
USA). Those who cannot afford to have such living pattern or consumption pattern will be
defined as poor.
Causes of poverty
There can be different ‘theories’ or value positions explaining the
origin or cause of poverty in society:
1. Individual responsibilities:
- ill health because of unhealthy life style, illiterate, unskilled, work ethics, low
motivations, etc.;
2. Societal/structural causes:
- disaster, accidents, structural unemployment, discrimination, class structure, etc.
Causes of poverty and social policies
"Deserving Poor" is the concept referring to the
targeted poor that the public would like to help as distinguished from those who are
"not deserving" and thus should not be helped or at most helped in a limited
way. For example, poor lazy people are not considered as "deserving", while poor
people not because of faults of themselves, such as victims of natural disasters , are
"deserving poor".
Responsibility and social policies
Whose responsibilities for meeting individual needs? Individual,
family or society? If the primarily responsibility rests on the individuals, then only
minimal help is provided. If the primarily responsibility rest on the families, then only
minimal help is provided and if provided it will go through the family as a unit (e.g. old
persons living with a family if applying public assistance has to made through the family
as a unit).
Conception of social security
- "social" = "societal", as distinct from, and complementary
to, or substitute other natural support systems i.e. family, kinship system, neighbour/
community;
- "security" = as against risk, misfortune, failure, poverty
Functions and Goals of Social Security
1) on individual level:
- income protection at times of contingencies (e.g. illness, unemployment, maternity,
...etc.) and alleviate individual sufferings;
- distribution of resources over one's lifetime for future possible risks.
2) on society level:
- communal/societal pooling of resources for sharing of risk, mutual help in modern
industrial society;
- social stabilization for economic production;
- egalitarian income redistribution.
Forms and Structures of Social Security
1) State social security - public assistance (means test); or cash allowance (non-means
test)
2) Central Provident Fund – the tripartite collaboration
3) Occupational insurance - labour insurance, unions protection, unemployment insurance
4) Private insurance - self responsibility
5) Private savings and family responsibility
6) Charities
Public assistance (PA)
- maintenance of basic living standard (poverty line); non-contributory;
- means-tested eligibility criteria.
Social insurance (SI)
- insurance against illness, disability, pregnancy, retirement, unemployment, ...etc.
- contributory; non-means-tested (no eligibility criteria);
- social / collective responsibility for individual.
Provident fund (PF)
- contributory, voluntary or compulsory saving;
- individual responsibility for self;
- can be ‘central’ CPF (centrally management by the government or a single statutory
body). HK is now having the Mandatory PF (MPF), i.e. contribution required by law but
privately operated, i.e. individual employer together with their employee chooses the
provident fund service provider in the private market, e.g. banks, insurance company.
Universal subsidy (US)
non-means-tested; certain eligibility criteria;
payment in terms of special needs allowance.
E.g. in HK: Old Age Allowance (all those aged 70 or above are eligible, irrespective of
being rich or poor), DA as certified by medical practitioners.
Evaluation of social security scheme:
| Coverage |
What is the target population/ clients? |
| Scope |
What type of risks are covered? |
| Benefits |
Level of payment/ relief - is it sufficient for subsistence/
or appropriate to reasonable standard of living? |
| Provisions |
Universal or selective (through
means-tested)? |
| take-up rate |
Can it really serve the needy target? Any element of stigma?
Administrative arrangement convenient or not? |
| Financing |
Source of revenue: from government,
employer or individuals? |
| Auspice |
Operated by government, NGO, or private market? Central
government or local government? |
| Functions |
Elimination /alleviation of poverty? Income redistribution?
Equity? Social stability? Replenish labour force? Etc. |
SOCIAL SECURITY IN HONG KONG
Hong Kong Government Policy Rationale:
1. safety net approach (social welfare policy)
2. to help those least able to help themselves
3. government's role to complement family's role in a Chinese society of HK
Administration & implementation of Social Security system: SWD:
- Social security field units all over the territory for CSSA & Special Needs
Allowance Centralized units for Criminal & Law Enforcement Injuries (CLEICS),
Compensation Scheme and the Traffic Accident Victims Assistance Scheme. (TAVAS)
- Assessment of applications processed by non-professional social work staff;
- Social Security Appeal Board to hear appeals if claimants are not satisfied of the
results:
Development of social security in Hong Kong
Pre-1971: assistance in kind (i.e. food and clothing)
71 Government assumed the responsibility, assistance began in cash benefit : Public
Assistance (PA) Scheme
73 Introduction of Special Need Allowance, Old Age Allowance (OAA), Disability
Allowance (DA)
78 Introduction of long term supplement and disregarded
income as supplement to PA;
78 Establishment of Social Security Appeal Board
88 Gradual lowering of OAA eligibility from 70 to 65, but 70-below has to declare
income
93 Implementation of new scheme CSSA, replacing the old PA scheme, merging the Old Age
Supplement (similar to OAA) with PA, etc.
98/99 review of CSSA: lowering of basic rate, compulsory job-seeking, community
service, Active Employment Assistance programme.
|